Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Phillip Adams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted (G3) by David Gerard . (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 22:27, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Phillip Adams

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Googles for "Daniel Phillip Adams" and "Daniel Adams chef" don't return much of anything other than a couple random podcasts, which aren't significant enough to confer notability. Smartyllama (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no way to verify any of the information on this article.WikiGuy1980 (talk) 17:56, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as hoax - any 15 year old that had worked in "best restaurants in the world including The Fat Duck" would be all over the papers. You don't work in a Michelin star kitchen as a kid and not be huge news, and then set a a new restaurant with a weebly.com webpage. KylieTastic (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Kylie beat me to it. Blatant out and out hoax. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:02, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.